JhunjhunuOn-siteMid Level
Applicants who checked fit first are 3.1× more likely to hear back
On-site in Jhunjhunu.
OK with that?Mid Level level, usually 3-5 years.
You have them?No pay range in the post.
Not a repost. 2 of Equitas Small Finance Bank's last 31 posts were reposts; 1 of its 29 open roles are here.
Skills listed in the post · tap the ones you have · 0 of 4
You almost certainly match several of these already.
This post sets 2 stated bars and lists 4 skills. Tap where you stand - nothing is saved, no account needed.
ASAI checks this on every job for you, automatically, so you apply where you fit.
How an ASAI match score looks. Yours is built from your resume, not a guess.
Your score for this role already exists - sign in to view it
ASAI compared this JD against 41 signals - skills, seniority, domain, stack overlap etc. Add a resume and it unlocks in about 30 seconds.
Always free · no credit card · 1 tap with Google
Starts free · 60-Day Pass ₹149 for 60 days, GST included
Free account, no card needed.
| Home | ||||||
| Field Risk Officer | ||||||
| SNO. | OBJECTIVE | WEIGHTAGE | KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR | Annexure | ||
| 1 | Adhere to Operational risk process as per the FRO activities check list | 50% | % of Incident closed | As per Annexure 1 | ||
| 2 | Identification of Spot & Incident reports | 20% | % of Gap Identified | As per Annexure 2 | ||
| 3 | Quality and Effectiveness of assigned task | 20% | % of Effectiveness | As per Annexure 3 | ||
| 4 | Self Development | 5% | Average Training Mandays | As per annexure 4 | ||
| 5 | Process Orientation | 5% | Audit Score | As per annexure 5 | ||
| Annexure - 1 | ||||||
| Scoring method | 5 (Outstanding) | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Very Good) | 2 (Good) | 1 (Adequate) | |
| % of Achievement | If actual achieved is 120% or above of target | If actual achieved is between 111-120% of target | If actual achieved is between 101-110% of target | If actual achieved is 100% of target | If actual achieved is below 100% of the target | |
| Annexure - 2 | ||||||
| Scoring method | 5 (Outstanding) | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Very Good) | 2 (Good) | 1 (Adequate) | |
| % of Achievement | No critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY, which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | One critical audit observations raised by internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | 2 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | 3 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | More than 3 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (TRM/ARM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO. | |
| Annexure - 3 | ||||||
| Scoring method | 5 (Outstanding) | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Very Good) | 2 (Good) | 1 (Adequate) | |
| % of Achievement | No compliance related/process gap/ audit queries, raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY. | Not more than 2 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY. | 3 to 4 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM / TRM during FY. | 5 to 6 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY. | More than 6 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM/TRM during FY. | |
| Annexure 4 - Self Development | ||||||
| Scoring method | 5 (Outstanding) | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Very Good) | 2 (Good) | 1 (Adequate) | |
| Average Mandays of Training per Team Member | >=3 | 2.5-2.99 | 2-2.49 | 1-1.99 | <1 | |
| Annexure 5 - Process Orientation | ||||||
| Scoring method | 5 (Outstanding) | 4 (Excellent) | 3 (Very Good) | 2 (Good) | 1 (Adequate) | |
| Audit Score | >95% | 91 - 95% | 81-90% | 71-80% | <71 | |
Get tomorrow's jobs before you have to search